(Photo by Daniel Janzen on Unsplash)
Note: this is part 4 of a series giving context for an 1886 article by Francis Grimké; see:
- Francis Grimke, “Mr. Moody and the Color Question in the South” (1886)
- “Caste Prejudice”: Black Protest against Dwight L. Moody, Part 1: 1885
- “The whole colored clergy was ignored”: Black Protest against Dwight L. Moody, Part 2: 1886)
- “DO NOT WANT MOODY”: Black Protest against Dwight L. Moody, Part 3: 1887–1894
Two Decades of “The Middle Wall of Separation”
In May 1876, Moody conducted a revival in Augusta, Georgia. An observer felt that “Perhaps there was never a time before now where religious feeling was stronger, deeper, or more general in Augusta… Mr. Moody thinks the cause of Christ ten-fold stronger upon earth than ever before, and that the great interest that is manifested in Augusta is but a type of the general spread of the gospel among the nations that is going on.” Of course, that “religious feeling” related to “piety” and “fervor” but had nothing to do with conviction over racism or white-supremacy. Apparently, at these meetings, whites literally put up a “wall of separation” to keep Black people in their place:
“When he first began holding his open-air meetings here, negroes mingled so indiscriminately with the audience that it became disagreeable to the whites, and a dividing fence was put up. Mr. Moody did not like this, and spoke of it, when one of our pastors informed him that it was impossible for the blacks and whites to mingle even in a religious audience. Mr. Moody then said, “I see you have not gotten over your rebellious feelings yet.” “No,” said the minister, “I am proud of my rebellious feelings and will be a rebel until I die.” The conversation was designably interrupted by others, and the matter was dropped.”
“Our Augusta Letter,” The Atlanta Constitution, May 4, 1876.
The matter was dropped, but the fence was not, and this “dividing fence” would remain a fixture at Moody’s meetings in the south for over two decades. This account of the “dividing fence” was reprinted across the country, in the New York Times, in the Chicago Tribune, in Boston, in Nashville, in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Iowa, and even across the Atlantic in England and in Scotland. (newspapers.com search).
Moody may have been personally opposed to segregation, but at his own meetings, he actually practiced it for nearly twenty years.
Continue reading “Black Protest against Dwight L. Moody, Part 4: “A Dividing Fence Was Put Up””